Comparative analysis of Ombudsman institutions in selected countries published
Supervision of security and defense institutions or, in a narrower sense, the work of security services is a very important segment of every society and of great importance for the democratization process, and therefore special attention is paid to the mechanisms of their control. When it comes to control carried out by independent institutions, the dominant place certainly belongs
To the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms.
Given the fact that this institution is an indispensable part of any democratic society, there is a logical need for constant strengthening of its internal capacities. This is the reason why the entire project “Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Ombudsman for Security Sector Oversight” is focused on mapping and long-term resolution of staff shortages in overseeing the security sector, in terms of human rights and freedoms, and monitoring the work of institutions in the field. security and defense.
In this regard, the project envisages overcoming the shortcomings, and in relation to informing employees about the functioning of the Ombudsman institutions from EU member states that can serve as an example of good practice, through a comprehensive, comparative analysis on this topic. Comparative analysis of Ombudsman institutions in selected countries: competencies,
Examples and recommendations provide an overview of good practices in the functioning of the Ombudsman Institution in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Austria.
The project “Strengthening the Institutional Capacities of the Ombudsman for Security Sector Oversight” is funded by the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany in Montenegro, and the end user and main partner is the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms of Montenegro.
